I think much of what this blog is about is to define what is a reasonable dialog about innovation.
By reasonable I do not mean a measured, even keel approach. I mean a dialog based on reason - that methodology by which we measure the validity of an argument not by its emotional weight but rather by it's intellectual validity.
The difficulty is just because innovation can be discussed in an orderly way it does not mean that innovation is an orderly process. Innovation is impacted greatly by the psychological mindset of the culture into which it is introduced. In short -- tech is logical, life isn't.
So the challenge is to find ways to manage the implementation of logic driven processes into an emotion spaces.
